Criminal Defense

May 6, 2016

Americans Show Up in Panama Papers

In another scandal that has disgusted the entire nation, it is reported that the passports of at least 200 Americans show up in this week’s 11 million data leak. The “Panama Papers” is the world’s largest document leak and went public on April 3rd. The documents detail the offshore bank accounts of the world’s richest people who have hidden their money in Panama to avoid taxes and other reasons. Vladimir Putin for example, is linked moving over $2 billion through shell companies.

The Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca is accused of aiding the registration of offshore companies for Americans and many other Europeans who are now either accused or convicted by federal prosecutors of serious financial crimes, including securities fraud and running a Ponzi scheme. In some cases, the shell companies, which are inactive companies that only serve to move assets around, were part of the fraudulent activities.

Currently, the documents are being analyzed by the Internal Revenue Service and approximately 350 investigative journalists under the umbrella of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. Amongst the Americans involved were Robert Miracle of Bellevue, Washington. He had already been indicted for running a Seattle-area Ponzi scheme under his shell company, Mcube Petroleum.

What are Ponzi Schemes?

According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a “Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that involves the payment of purported returns to existing investors from funds contributed by new investors.” Fraudsters attract new money to make promised payments to earlier stage investors to give the appearance that they are investing in a legitimate business. They require a constant flow of new money because they have little to no legitimate business earnings.

Securities Fraud

In California, our state’s Supreme Court has said that the definition of a security needs to be decided on a case by case basis. Securities fraud is occurs when one induces investors to make purchase or sale decisions on the basis of false information. It is either a misdemeanor or felony, punishable by up to three years imprisonment/$1 million fine or five years imprisonment/$10 million fine. However, the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 does not allow criminal penalties to be assessed unless the defendant broke the law ‘willfully.’ If you merely made a mistake and gave the wrong advice to an investor, you cannot be convicted. Continue reading

May 4, 2016

The U.S. Government Creates Fake University to Lure Fake Students

by David M. Boertje

According to a DOJ press release, brokers, recruiters, and employers from across the United States who allegedly conspired with more than 1,000 foreign nationals to fraudulently maintain student visas and obtain foreign worker visas through a “pay to stay” fake New Jersey college. The University of Northern New Jersey is a fake school made up by the Department of Justice with no teachers, no counselors, no curriculum, and no classes. It was just an office “staffed with federal agents posing as school administrators.”

The defendants were arrested in New Jersey and Washington by special agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and charged with 14 complaints including conspiracy to commit visa fraud, conspiracy to harbor aliens for profit, and other offenses. The defendants operated recruiting companies for international students. Acting as recruiters, they solicited undercover agents to participate in a scheme to get F-1 student and H-1B skilled worker visas. They admitted to the undercover agents their clients would not take classes, and were getting a commission for obtaining visas.

Most of the clients were from China and India, and used the visas to get coveted jobs at Apple and Facebook. The feds are now working to terminate the nonimmigrant status for the foreigners involved in the scheme and deporting the participants. The government claims creating the fake university was not entrapment because those who tried to defraud the immigration system were already predisposed to criminal activity. The 1000 foreigners looking for visas were also willing participants.

What is Entrapment?

Entrapment can be generally defined as when law enforcement induces someone to commit a crime they otherwise would not have been likely to commit. The key, then, is that if you were already predisposed to criminal activity, it is not entrapment. See CA Penal Code § 647. This is based on the premise that reasonable law abiding citizens will say “no” when given an opportunity to commit a crime.

Entrapment is an affirmative legal defense, but you will have the burden to show that law enforcement was acting illegally. More importantly, the defense only applies to entrapment caused by law enforcement. The defense does not apply if private citizens not acting as a police agents convince you to commit a crime. Continue reading

April 29, 2016

Cliven Bundy’s Chosen Attorney Has Ethical Conflicts; Precluded From Case

by David M. Boertje

In the continuing saga of Cliven Bundy and his band of anti-government followers, Nevada’s chief federal judge Gloria Navarro has formally refused to allow nationally known conservative lawyer Larry Klayman join Cliven Bundy’s defense team. In a three page legal order, Navarro revealed that Mr. Klayman has some potential discipline issues with the D.C. Bar Association. She has that his disclosure in court papers claimed that no disciplinary action has been taken and the proceedings were likely to be resolved in his favor. This was “misleading and incomplete.”

According to court documents, his troubles with the Washington bar stemmed from three separate alleged conflicts of interest in litigation involving Judicial Watch after he left the organization as its legal counsel.

Klayman, the founder of the Washington-based public interest groups Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, is known for his litigious strategy in pursuit of conservative issues. Bundy is now currently represented by Las Vegas attorney Joel Hansen, who is active in the ultraconservative Independent American Party of Nevada. He filed papers pleading for the court to allow Klayman to be part of Bundy’s defense team. Klayman is allowed to reapply to represent Bundy pending he submits documents related to those proceedings.

April 27, 2016

Lawsuit Alleges 30 Guns in Professor’s Workspace

by David M. Boertje

A Miramar College adjunct professor has filed a lawsuit against the school claiming he did not get a promised full-time faculty spot after he raised concerns about firearms that were missing or unregistered at the school. The school happens to have a firing range for the San Diego police academy. Jim Soeten is a part-time professor filed a claim with the school on February 5. It was rejected by the college on March 19, to which Soeten and his lawyer gave notice of a formal lawsuit.

Back in October 2014, another faculty member, Jordan Omens, was disciplined for bringing a firearm to a meeting (Omens was placed on leave after the incident). Soeten had also complained to the school that other faculty members were illegally selling ammunition to students. In his lawsuit, Soeten says that more than 30 firearms have been found by college officials in the office area and workspace that were not owned by the school. He also claims that one gun was found to be registered to former San Diego Police Chief and Mayor Jerry Sanders. The lawsuit further claims that Soeten was told to keep quiet about the unaccounted-for firearms.

Guns in Schools in California: Exemptions

April 22, 2016

Unpaid Traffic Tickets in California: Can I Go to Jail?

by David M. Boertje

Last year, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch went on record as in a speech at the White House, actively opposing judges imposing traffic fines, calling such “the criminalization of poverty.” She cited the case study of Ferguson, in which citizens who have attempted to pay the ever-increasing fines of their traffic tickets and were subsequently arrested for not being able to come up with the money associated with late fees.

Fines Increase With Time

If you have received a parking or traffic ticket, you can bet that the fine will increase if it is not paid within the time specified on the ticket (usually 30 days). State and local governments fundraise through driving and parking tickets and they have no incentive to keep the prices down in the interests of fairness.

April 20, 2016

Law Enforcement Investigators Seek out Private DNA Databases

by David M. Boertje

While the allure of exploring one’s family tree and lineage has meant big business for some companies, two major that research family lineage (for a fee) claim that over the last two years, they have received law enforcement demands for genetic information stored in their DNA databases. Ancestry.com and their competitor 23andme, hold the genetic information of hundreds of thousands of people. They have received five requests from law enforcement agencies for the DNA of six people.

Ancestry.com did turn over one person’s data for an investigation into the murder and rape of an 18-year-old woman in Idaho Falls, Idaho. 23andme has received four other court orders but have been successful in persuading investigators to withdraw the requests.

Privacy advocates and experts are concerned that genetic information turned over for medical, family history research or other highly personal reasons will be misused by investigators, and that this new trend could start a slippery slope.

April 8, 2016

Lincoln High School Fight Leads to Dispute Over Discipline

by David M. Boertje

As the result of a fight at Lincoln High School in San Diego, the 16-year-old son of local rap artist Brandon “Tiny Doo” Duncan faces four felony juvenile charges: assault on a police officer, assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, violent resisting of a police officer and assault on a school officer. Another student faces a felony assault charge against a police officer. A third one faces an additional misdemeanor theft charge for allegedly taking the officer’s police radio and keys during the scuffle. The fight was started when the boys started play fighting during lunch period. That led to a real fight.

Bashir Abdi of El Cerrito, the cop on campus was reported to be ‘seriously injured.‘ He tased and pepper sprayed the students, and is now suing the students for over $25,000 in damages in medical expenses, property damage, and other losses.

None of the students will be expelled, and the judge allowed all the students to go home instead of staying in ‘juvie.’ They will have electronic monitoring for the time being. While some have called the punishment against the students fair because it was not as strict as it could have been, some in the community, including the NAACP, have called for the District Attorney’s Office to drop all charges and stop over-policing Lincoln High.

Juvenile Felonies

Juvenile delinquency court is a court dedicated to adjudicating felony and misdemeanor crimes allegedly committed by minors, and it ranges from small charges like truancy to more serious ones like felony charges. The goal is to rehabilitate children and not to imprison them.

Under certain circumstances however, minors alleged to have committed one of 30 crimes listed in California Code § 707(b) also can be tried in adult court. These include: murder, arson causing great bodily injury, assault with great bodily injury, rape, robbery, kidnapping for ransom, etc.

Prosecutors have the sole discretion as to how to prosecute 707(b) offenses. They can either file directly in adult court, file in juvenile court, or they can initiate a “fitness hearing” and have a judge decide the issue.

In these situations, prosecutors tend to file charges as adults if the minor has both allegedly committed a 707(b) crime and previously committed another felony or used a firearm during the crime. Continue reading

March 23, 2016

Navy Offering Reward for Information on Bomb Threats

by David M. Boertje

Earlier this week, the Naval base in San Diego received a phone call that specifically threatened one of the buildings on the base. Around 9:15am, someone called in and threatened to bomb Building 36. Around 9:15am, the base posted on its Facebook page that the area had been secured, meaning they did not find evidence of bomb(s). There was a perimeter set up between Pier 3 and Pier 5.

This is the second threat at Naval Base San Diego within two weeks. Previously, a hand-written note sparked an investigation and the evacuation of the pier at 32nd Street and Harbor Drive.

The base is currently not on lockdown. Now the Navy is offering a $5,000 reward for any information leading to the arrest of the person who made the fake bomb threat. A spokesperson for the Navy stated that since last November, 11 fake bomb threats have been made.

March 18, 2016

1998 Molestation Conviction Expected to be Thrown Out Due to False Testimony

by David M. Boertje

Up in Lakeport, California, a 71 year old man named Luther Jones Jr. is expected to be released from state prison within the next few weeks because it has come to light that the key testimony used to convict him was fabricated. Jones was sent to prison 18 years ago for a 27-year sentence, for allegedly molesting a 10-year-old girl who belonged to his ex-girlfriend. He had a criminal record of felonies and theft cases, and the physical evidence had shown signs of sexual trauma on the child.

In this bizarre case, the child victim, now 30, has come forward to say that Jones never molested her. Evidently the child had been told to lie by her mother. She was indeed molested back in 1998, but by her mother’s then-boyfriend. District Attorney Don Anderson said he will file a writ of habeas corpus this week. He even canceled his vacation plans to begin the process of freeing Jones.

Currently, Jones is in very poor health but was previously denied for medical parole. He has filed several lawsuits complaining about the inadequate healthcare he has received from prison officials, which include diabetes, issues with his liver and kidneys, hepatitis C, and spinal deterioration. It is unknown whether legal action may be brought against the victim’s mother for her terrible behavior 18 years ago.

California Writ of Habeas Corpus

“Habeas corpus” literally means “you have the body,” and is a constitutional right. In the U.S. criminal justice system, a writ of habeas corpus is used to bring a prisoner or other detainee before a court to determine whether the imprisonment is unlawful. It is filed as a civil action (lawsuit) against the State agent (usually a warden) who is currently holding the defendant in custody when one has a showing that s/he has been wrongfully imprisoned. Today, the writ is mostly used for prisoners who want to challenge their detention if something went wrong in his/her trial (ie. prosecutor misconduct). It may also be used to examine a bail amount, the conditions of imprisonment, and jurisdiction of a specific court.

In California, the right to file a writ of habeas corpus petition is guaranteed by the California constitution, if you fulfill these legal requirements:

You are actually in custody (including out on parole/bail);
You have exhausted all your legal remedies, meaning you have tried everything to free yourself (ie. appeals);
Your issue is not already resolved on appeal.

March 4, 2016

“He Said, San Diego Unified Said”

by David M. Boertje

Back in July of 2015, a man named Mike Gurrieri filed a lawsuit against the San Diego Unified School District’s superintendent for allegedly ordering edits to his criminal investigation to cover up for the accused principal. Mr. Gurrieri was assigned by the San Diego Unified School District as an internal investigator to investigate a sexual assault that allegedly occurred at Green Elementary School in San Carlos, California. Parents had filed a claim that the school’s principal, Bruce Ferguson, took little to no action and did not even report it to the police. Mr. Gurrieri claims he spent months digging to find that several allegations by different students have been mishandled. Mr. Gurrieri was then allegedly fired for not complying with the cover-up.

Court documents filed by district attorneys state that Gurrieri was incapable of conducting an adequate investigation and had asked school-district officials to fire him because the job was too difficult for him. The San Diego School District hired attorneys to defend their case against Gurrieri’s lawsuit back in September. The district claims that Gurrieri’s report was based on “hearsay,” rumors, and gossip. The differing stories mean that there is a long legal battle ahead, as both parties engage in a dance of “he said, she said.”

What is Hearsay?

Hearsay is a relevant issue in criminal trials. It may be generally defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts. As a result, hearsay evidence is often inadmissible at trial. See the California Rules of Evidence. Thus, the original speaker, or eyewitness, must be present at the trial and giving the statement under oath (ie. “I saw him pull out the gun”). The reasoning behind this rule is that hearsay is generally not reliable, unless the speaker is available to be cross-examined by the opposing side.

Hearsay must be a statement, meaning it must be an oral assertion, written statement, or nonverbal conduct.

The Exceptions

While there is a general prohibition to allowing hearsay into the evidence of a trial (or lawsuit), the California Evidence Code sets forth a long list of exceptions to the hearsay rule. Some include:

A declarant’s spontaneous or excited utterances. Startling statements are considered reliable because they were made stress before s/he had a chance to fabricate;
The Declarant’s existing mental state or physical condition;
Business and public records;
Former testimony given under oath;
A witness’s past recorded (written) recollection which may be read into evidence;
Dying declarations;
Certain statements by children (particularly in sexual assault cases).